What to report
Please report factual errors, stale sources, broken citations, misleading examples, incorrect attribution, duplicate or conflicting pages, accessibility problems, privacy concerns, and claims that appear to overstate a result, credential, location, customer relationship, or security posture.
How to submit a correction
Use the contact form and include:
- the exact page URL;
- the sentence, heading, image, or structured-data field at issue;
- why it appears wrong or misleading;
- a primary or authoritative source when one is available; and
- whether the issue creates an urgent privacy, security, safety, or legal risk.
Do not submit passwords, API keys, private client records, exploit code, or other secrets through the general form. For a suspected vulnerability, follow the instructions on the security page.
How corrections are handled
The engineering team checks the current page, its source reference, related pages, and any structured data or machine-readable summaries that repeat the claim. A confirmed error is corrected at the source of truth where possible so the website, schema, and language-model reference files do not continue to disagree.
Small spelling or formatting fixes may be made without a visible note. A material correction—one that changes the meaning of a factual claim, result, attribution, recommendation, or service-area statement—receives a new modification date and an explanatory note where readers would otherwise be misled by the change.
What this process does not promise
Submission does not guarantee that the requested wording will be adopted. Evidence may conflict, a source may describe a different time period, or the proposed edit may introduce another unsupported claim. The response is to evaluate the evidence and make the page more accurate, not to preserve either party's preferred framing.
Privacy and attribution
A correction can be reviewed without a public name. If a contributor wants public credit, that permission must be explicit. Contact details and private evidence are not published merely because they were submitted with a correction.
Propagation
When a material claim appears in multiple places, the review includes relevant webpages, structured data, llms.txt, llms-full.txt, and reusable components. Search engines and answer systems may retain cached copies after publication; the team can correct the owned source but cannot control every external cache or generated answer.